• Home
  • Help
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search

 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average

How would you troubleshoot a VM experiencing high disk latency?

#1
06-21-2023, 12:02 PM
I would recommend starting by gathering performance metrics to pinpoint the source of the high disk latency you're facing. Utilize tools like Windows Performance Monitor, ESXi performance charts, or data collecting agents specific to your VM host. Focus on key counters such as Average Disk sec/Read and Average Disk sec/Write. High values in these counters will give you a clear indication that the time taken to read from or write to the disk is significantly above normal thresholds.

If you see these averages climbing above 15 milliseconds, that indicates you're entering a problematic area. Additionally, look at IOPS statistics to determine if the current workload exceeds the capabilities of your storage setup. I often find that analyzing these metrics provides the quickest snapshot of what might be going wrong. If you're observing a spike in the number of disk operations, that could lead us to the next phase of the investigation.

Examining Storage Configuration
After establishing the metrics around disk latency, you'd want to inspect the current storage architecture. I suggest evaluating RAID configurations, as certain ones perform better under load. For instance, RAID 0 provides the best read and write performance because it strips data across multiple disks, but it lacks redundancy. RAID 1's mirroring, while slower, can offer better read performance at the risk of write speed.

If your setup is RAID 5 or RAID 6, note that while these configurations offer a good balance of storage efficiency and fault tolerance, they can suffer from write penalties due to parity calculations, especially when under a heavy workload. If you suspect RAID configuration is a factor, I would recommend analyzing the read/write patterns and considering whether a change or even a shift to an SSD-based architecture might yield better results.

Storage Tiering and Performance
In addition to assessing RAID setups, consider the role of storage tiering in your environment. I often find that utilizing tiered storage can dramatically affect performance, specifically when you have a mix of HDDs and SSDs. Make sure you fully exploit the high-speed SSDs for critical workloads, particularly databases or applications that involve high IOPS.

On the surface, the structure might appear robust, but inadequate tiering can lead to bottlenecks. For instance, if your VM primarily resides on standard HDDs, and you've got workloads demanding high-speed access, you'll run into trouble. Talk with your storage team about implementing automated tiering solutions that manage data placement dynamically. I've seen this approach significantly improve performance metrics, especially when the workload changes throughout the day.

Disk Throttling and Resource Contention
Another area of concern is whether there's any disk I/O throttling or resource contention occurring within the VM. Ensure that the settings around queuing limits are appropriate for your workload. Sometimes, if a VM isn't allocated enough resources, you'll experience contention not just for the disk I/O but also CPU cycles and memory, amplifying latency issues.

To confirm resource allocation, I would monitor how many VMs are contending for the same disk subsystem. An overcommitted disk resource can lead to performance degradation even with solid infrastructure in place. If your environment runs on hypervisors, check the PPP settings, which lets you control how many VMs megahertz share the underlying resources. I found that consistently monitoring these factors can mitigate risks associated with system overload.

File System and Fragmentation 
You should also inspect the file system used by the VM. If the systems are not using a highly efficient file system, that could lead to higher disk latencies. For example, NTFS has its strengths; however, in certain situations, especially with high-frequency read and write operations, it may not perform optimally. Consider the nature of your workloads and whether it's feasible to transition to something like ReFS, which offers improvements in certain scenarios, primarily around large files and resilience.

Fragmentation can worsen latencies as well. If files on your disks become fragmented, the read/write heads will spend more time seeking and less time transferring data. I recommend running defragmentation tools if fragmentation is evident, especially for HDD-based systems. For SSDs, however, you'll want to ensure TRIM is enabled to maintain performance over time, as excessive fragmentation impacts reads and writes differently on SSDs compared to traditional HDDs.

I/O Scheduler and Queue Depth Settings
Additionally, consider the I/O scheduler in use and the queue depth settings of your storage. Each hypervisor has its own configurable I/O scheduler that determines how disk requests get prioritized. If you're using VMware, for instance, consider switching between different I/O schedulers based on your workload needs. You should check whether the default setting is optimized for your current workload.

Queue depth settings influence how many requests the storage can handle concurrently. In a high-concurrency environment, increasing queue depth could improve throughput. However, you must find the sweet spot, as an exceedingly high queue depth can lead to high latencies due to overwhelming the storage system. I often experiment with these settings in a test environment to find the best configuration without impacting production workloads.

Future-Proofing and Reviewing Long-term Solutions
Once you've comprehensively analyzed the situation, start investigating long-term solutions to prevent recurrence. You might want to explore NVMe storage options that could drastically reduce latencies and expand your storage capabilities. NVMe drives utilize the PCIe bus and can handle significantly higher IOPS compared to SATA-based SSDs or spinning disks.

While optimizing existing systems provides relief, we must think of future growth. Depending on the rate of data expansion and application loads, you should evaluate how scalable your current storage architecture is. I've found it beneficial to establish a more modular system that makes it easier to integrate additional resources as workload requirements evolve over time. Keep storage expansion options open, as they can matically elevate the performance level as demands increase.

A Note on BackupChain
You're in a situation where high disk latency can really impede performance. I suggest taking a good look at BackupChain. The platform specializes in robust backup solutions for SMBs and professionals with the capability to protect Hyper-V, VMware, Windows Server, and many other systems. Using tools like BackupChain can help maintain your storage reliability and make a profound difference in data management processes. The insight I've gained from such tools adds significant value to how we manage data efficiently.

savas@BackupChain
Offline
Joined: Jun 2018
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



  • Subscribe to this thread
Forum Jump:

FastNeuron FastNeuron Forum General IT v
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 … 18 Next »
How would you troubleshoot a VM experiencing high disk latency?

© by FastNeuron Inc.

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode